This past month I read Perception by Kim Harrington. For those of you who haven’t heard
about Perception, it’s the follow up to Harrington’s debut last year, Clarity.
I truly enjoyed both books. But, I don’t just enjoy books, I study them.
I try to find why each of them stands out for me. And for me, Clarity and Perception stand out as perfect mysteries. Harrington does such an
amazing job of giving out little bread crumbs, adding to the mystery, at all
the right places. Not only that, everyone looks like a suspect. And I mean
everyone. You’re not absolutely 100% sure who the guilty party is until Clarity
herself knows at the very end of the novel.
http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/view_photog.php?photogid=721 |
I came up with a short list based on what I learned from
Harrington’s writing.
1 – Believable characters and world – the world and
characters that Harrington delivers are not only believable, but it’s easy to
like and relate to Clarity. Even if you don’t have psychic powers and have been
bullied in high school because of who you are, you can still relate. Her setting
is a place to get lost in and possibly add to your list of places to visit.
2 – Bread crumbs – Harrington gives the reader just
enough bread crumbs to start making guesses. Then she gives more bread crumbs
to make the reader doubt the first assumption and create another one. Harrington
does this several times until the last couple chapters when Clarity herself
figures it out on her own.
3 – Research – Harrington definitely did her research and
it shows. Everything is believable through and through. She knew her stuff when
it came to the types of stalkers. And she introduced it perfectly, rather than
creating an info-dump session.
4 – Tension building – Harrington did so well building up
the tension throughout both of her novels that it’s difficult to put the book
down at all until the final page has been read.
5 – Bad guys are smart, but not smart enough – In both
books the bad guy/gal was smart about how they committed their crimes. They
covered their tracks extremely well, but not so good that they couldn’t get
caught and the pieces couldn’t be put together. In Harrington’s novels the
pieces don’t all get put together until the last two or three chapters.
Your turn ->
What do you think makes a good mystery?
I have to admit I don't read a lot of mysteries though I do like to be surprised. I have to check out Harrington's books.
ReplyDeleteI don't usually read mysteries either, but hers are really good. She also has a middle grade mystery series that's debuting this summer called Sleuth or Dare.
DeleteI think these are essential elements for any genre, maybe not quite to the extreme, but I think readers really enjoy the process of figuring out a puzzle to some extent. Great post - glad I found your blog!
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by Tasha! Figuring out a puzzle is definitely a big part of the draw to mysteries. It's like playing Clue! lol
DeleteHi Heather, I love mysteries! Some of your points ring true. Like any good Agatha Christie, most of the mystery comes through in the last couple of chapters but you couldnt simply read the first two or last two chapters of the book and get it! You still gotta read the whole thing. Like Rebecca Stead's When You Reach Me, which was the last MG mystery that I read that I was absolutely stunned by. -Archana
ReplyDeleteI'll have to take a look at When You Reach Me. Thanks for the recommendation. There's no way you could read the first and last chapters and get it. I don't want to give anything away, so I won't reveal more. hahaha! :-)
Delete